Anthem Blanchard Raised $5M on Fabricated Contracts and Left 200 Investors With Nothing

Son of gold pioneer Jim Blanchard III, Anthem raised $5.2M from 200 investors on contracts Anthem Holdings never had, revenue projections with no factual basis, and a large investment that did not exist. The company declared insolvency in April 2024.

News Desk
By
News Desk
Hannah Howell NewsDesk
Author
A news and investigative research publication focused on financial misconduct, corporate accountability, consumer protection, regulatory enforcement, securities fraud, cryptocurrency-related risks, and public-interest investigations.
- Author
158 Views
9 Min Read
Anthem Blanchard

Anthem Hayek Blanchard, founder and CEO of Anthem Holdings Company, carries one of the most recognizable names in American precious metals history. His father, James U. Blanchard III, was the legendary goldbug and precious metals pioneer who helped restore Americans’ legal right to own gold in 1974 after President Nixon’s 1971 gold window closure and the subsequent prohibition on private ownership, and who founded Blanchard and Company, once the world’s largest rare coin and bullion dealer. The younger Blanchard built his own career in adjacent territory: co-founding Anthem Vault Inc., a precious metals dealer; AnthemGold Inc., an asset-backed blockchain software company; and Hera Software Development, a ransomware-proof data company. He served on the board of Pernix Therapeutics Holdings, spoke at precious metals conferences, guest lectured at Stanford, and worked as Director of Strategic Development at GoldMoney during a period when he helped grow the firm’s holdings from $1 million to over $1 billion. Blanchard holds a Bachelor of Business Administration from Emory University’s Goizueta Business School with concentrations in Professional Accounting and Finance. Between September 2020 and July 2022, he and Anthem Holdings raised approximately $5.2 million from approximately 200 investors in two securities offerings, using offering materials and investor presentations that the SEC alleges contained a series of lies about the company’s contracts, pipeline, revenue projections, and existing investment commitments. On July 31, 2026, the SEC filed consent and proposed final judgments resolving its case against both Blanchard and Anthem Holdings.

The settlement, subject to court approval, permanently enjoins both defendants from future violations of the Securities Act and Exchange Act antifraud provisions and prohibits them from participating in any securities offering for ten years. Anthem Holdings pays a civil penalty of $1,000,000. Blanchard personally pays a civil penalty of $236,451. The company declared itself financially insolvent in April 2024, stating in court documents that it was unable to fulfill any monetary claims, including significant back pay owed to former employees. The SEC’s original complaint filed in September 2024 sought an officer and director bar against Blanchard, which the final settlement resolves through the ten-year securities activity prohibition instead.

Contracts That Were Never Secured, Deals That Were Never Closing, Revenue That Was Never Coming

The SEC’s complaint identifies four distinct categories of misrepresentation in the Anthem Holdings fundraising. First, Blanchard and the company asserted to investors that Anthem Holdings had secured contracts it had not secured, presenting nonexistent agreements as established business relationships that would generate revenue. Second, the defendants stated that Anthem Holdings was on the verge of closing deals when Blanchard knew that was not true, creating false urgency and momentum in the pitch. Third, Anthem Holdings projected millions of dollars in revenue from those supposed contracts without any reasonable factual basis to believe the company would actually earn that revenue. The SEC complaint describes the projections as “wildly inflated” and the financial modeling used to support them as “incorrect.” Fourth, the offering materials referenced a large investment in the company that did not exist, presenting a phantom commitment as validation of the company’s prospects and the credibility of its management.

The investors who funded the Series A equity offering between September 2020 and mid-2021, contributing $5 million, and the two investors who put in over $200,000 in the Pre-Series B convertible note offering in July 2022, made their decisions based on a picture of Anthem Holdings that the complaint says was fabricated in its most material details. Many of those investors reside in Kansas, where the case was filed. The Bartlesville Examiner-Enterprise reported that Blanchard had purchased the former Washington County Courthouse in Bartlesville, Oklahoma, to serve as Anthem Holdings’ headquarters after relocating the company from Nevada in 2021, a physical expansion that projected stability and ambition at precisely the same time the company was raising money on contracts it did not have.

Insolvency, Unpaid Employees, and a Company That Could Not Honor Its Own Restitution

By April 2024, the gap between Anthem Holdings’ presented financial picture and its actual condition became a matter of public record when Blanchard declared in court documents that the company was financially insolvent and unable to fulfill any monetary claims. The insolvency declaration specifically noted significant back pay owed to former employees, meaning the company’s financial failures extended beyond investor losses to include workers who had not been paid for services they had already rendered. The $1,000,000 civil penalty against Anthem Holdings ordered in the settlement is subject to the same insolvency constraint: there is no indication in the settlement documents of any mechanism by which the company, declared insolvent two years before the judgment was entered, will satisfy the seven-figure penalty. Blanchard’s personal $236,451 penalty represents a more recoverable amount, though the settlement does not specify payment timing or source of funds. Neither Blanchard nor Anthem Holdings admitted the SEC’s allegations.

A Legacy Name in Precious Metals and a 10-Year Bar From the Securities Business

The Blanchard family name carries specific weight in the world of alternative assets and hard money investment. James U. Blanchard III lobbied Congress for a decade to restore Americans’ right to own gold, achieved that goal with the Gold Ownership Act that took effect December 31, 1974, and built Blanchard and Company into one of the largest coin and bullion dealers in the United States before his death in 1999. Anthem Blanchard built on that brand recognition by positioning himself as a precious metals and digital asset expert across conference circuits, media appearances, and board memberships. The SEC’s complaint against him centers not on precious metals or blockchain products but on the software development company he ran through the Series A and Pre-Series B offerings, Anthem Holdings. The ten-year prohibition on participating in any securities offering effectively ends his ability to raise capital for any venture in that timeframe, a consequence that touches every company he has been associated with, including the still-operating entities that carry the Blanchard family brand. His settlement with the SEC was filed July 31, 2026.

Conclusion

Anthem Blanchard raised $5.2 million from 200 investors by describing contracts Anthem Holdings had not secured, deals that were not closing, revenue projections with no factual basis, and a large investment commitment that did not exist. He did so while running a company that would declare itself financially insolvent two years later, still owing back pay to its own former employees. His father spent his career fighting to give Americans the right to own hard assets as a protection against institutional failure. The son raised $5.2 million on institutional representations that the SEC says were fabricated. The investors lost their money. The company is insolvent. The civil penalty is $1.2 million combined. Neither defendant admitted wrongdoing. The ten-year securities bar begins now.

Share This Article
Hannah Howell NewsDesk
Author
Follow:
A news and investigative research publication focused on financial misconduct, corporate accountability, consumer protection, regulatory enforcement, securities fraud, cryptocurrency-related risks, and public-interest investigations.
1 Comment
  • **THE ANTHEM BLANCHARD HOUSE OF CARDS HAS COLLAPSED — AND CHAD KOEHN’S ROLE DESERVES FAR MORE SCRUTINY**

    For years, Anthem Blanchard sold investors an image: visionary entrepreneur, blockchain pioneer, technology executive, heir to one of the most respected names in the precious-metals industry.

    According to the SEC, the reality behind that sales pitch was something very different.

    The SEC alleged that Blanchard and Anthem Holdings raised approximately **$5.2 MILLION from roughly 200 investors** while making materially false or misleading representations concerning contracts, prospective deals, revenue projections and investment commitments.

    Contracts that allegedly weren’t there.

    Deals portrayed as imminent that allegedly weren’t closing.

    Revenue projections the SEC says lacked a reasonable factual basis.

    And an investment commitment that allegedly **did not exist.**

    Then came insolvency.

    Employees allegedly left waiting for back pay. Investors holding essentially worthless interests. And now Blanchard has consented—without admitting the allegations—to a proposed judgment that would impose a **$236,451 personal civil penalty, a ten-year prohibition on participating in securities offerings, and permanent antifraud injunctions.** Anthem Holdings faces another **$1 million civil penalty.**

    But the story should not end with Anthem Blanchard.

    **People should also be asking serious questions about Chad Koehn.**

    Koehn is not a defendant in the SEC case described above, and he should not be falsely portrayed as one. But his own regulatory history is extraordinarily relevant.

    FINRA found that Koehn participated in private securities transactions **without providing written notice to or obtaining approval from his brokerage firm.** According to FINRA, Koehn discussed a private placement with prospective investors, told them he intended to invest, introduced them to the company’s founder, and invited them to meetings he hosted where the founder made presentations about the company and its private placement.

    The result?

    **At least 59 people invested approximately $1.475 MILLION.**

    Approximately **34 were customers of Koehn’s brokerage firm.**

    FINRA responded by imposing a **$10,000 deferred fine and suspending Koehn from association with any FINRA member for one year.**

    That is not internet gossip. That is FINRA’s own disciplinary record.

    And that makes a very obvious question unavoidable:

    **When investors were being introduced, gathered, reassured and encouraged to put substantial money into ventures promoted through this network, who knew what—and when did they know it?**

    The public deserves answers.

    The investors deserve answers.

    The employees who went unpaid deserve answers.

    And regulators should be following every dollar, every investor introduction, every presentation, every representation and every person who helped place investors in the room.

    What makes the Blanchard story particularly disgraceful is the contrast with the family legacy he inherited. James U. Blanchard III spent years championing individual financial freedom and the right of Americans to protect their wealth through ownership of hard assets.

    His son now stands accused by the SEC of raising millions of dollars through material misrepresentations—and has agreed to a proposed judgment that would keep him out of securities offerings for a decade.

    **That is not entrepreneurship. That is a catastrophic destruction of investor trust.**

    And anyone who helped funnel investors toward these ventures should not be permitted to simply reinvent himself, scrub the internet, polish a biography and move on as though dozens of investors never lost their money.

    Due diligence matters.

    Regulatory history matters.

    FINRA records matter.

    SEC enforcement actions matter.

    And reputations built through glossy websites, conference appearances, impressive titles and carefully crafted biographies should never outweigh what government regulators have actually put into the public record.

    **Anthem Blanchard’s investors deserved the truth before they wrote their checks.**

    **They deserve the full truth now.**

    And the spotlight should not stop with Blanchard.

    **Follow the money. Follow the introductions. Follow the investor meetings. Follow the people who helped make the fundraising machine work.**

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *